Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jamie Loeb vs Isabelle Boulais Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Loeb vs Boulais analysis and find out who is favored!
Jamie Loeb vs Isabelle Boulais Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 0 Boulais
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Loeb has won 48.09% of points on his second serve, while Boulais has won 40.05%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Loeb, in recent form, has won 53.52% of his opponent's second serve points, while Boulais has won 55.44%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.51% and 37.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Loeb has saved 56.48% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Boulais has saved 55.04% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Loeb has won 48.21% of matches played (W/L 27/ 29), with Boulais winning 56.41% (W/L 22/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Loeb has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 33/ 22), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 8/ 16). Boulais has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 29/ 21), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 27/ 37).
- Player level: In the last year, Loeb has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 49.06% of matches (W/L 26/ 27), where as Boulais has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Loeb winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Loeb winning 2 and Boulais winning 0. The last match between Loeb and Boulais was at the W50 Morelia, 13-02-2024, First, Hard with Jamie Loeb getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Loeb and Boulais have played a deciding set 0 times, with Loeb winning 0 times and Boulais 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Loeb winning 0, and Boulais 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Loeb has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.14 while Boulais has played against players with an average rank of 167.87.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Loeb has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Boulais has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Loeb has converted 47.04% of breakpoint opportunities, and Boulais has converted 52.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Loeb 1 - 0 Boulais
307
Rank
132
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
641
Rank
641
High
24
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
55% (295-245)
Career Total W/L
50% (72-72)
56% (15-12)
YTD W/L
50% (8-8)
$219,866
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Isabelle Boulais |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 5 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (28/51) | 50% (31/62) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 71% (22/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 42% (13/31) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (4/14) | 50% (1/2) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (27/62) | 33% (17/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Jamie Loeb
Player
Isabelle Boulais
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jamie Loeb | Isabelle Boulais |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 56% (15/12) | 50% (8/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (36/28) | 47% (17/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (313/273) | 49% (157/162) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 80% (8/2) | 50% (6/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (6/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 20% (1/4) | 50% (2/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 79 | 48 |
| DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.45 |
| DFs Total | 96 | 69 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:48 | 1:30:33 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 302.52 | 185.75 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (1010/1841) | 64% (666/1033) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (667/1010) | 64% (423/666) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (406/830) | 40% (147/367) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (109/237) | 53% (58/110) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (865/1913) | 44% (447/1014) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (15/12) | 50% (8/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 53% (8/15) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 44% (4/9) | 80% (4/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 86% (7/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 14% (7/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 22% (9/2) |
Jamie Loeb Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
7
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
41%
(
21 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
48 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
45 of
94)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
56%
(
54 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
50 of
100)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
51%
(
22 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Iva Jovic
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Ana Sofia Sanchez
46%
(
23 of
50)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
1
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
46%
(
23 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
62
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ashton Bowers
Player
Jamie Loeb
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
50%
(
45 of
90)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
49%
(
35 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
43 of
90)
79
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Sophie Chang
51%
(
40 of
79)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
72%
(
28 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
73)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Katrina Scott
Player
Jamie Loeb
57%
(
56 of
98)
1st Serve %
62%
(
69 of
112)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
112)
106
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(9) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Akasha Urhobo
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
56 of
82)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
32%
(
10 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
42%
(
36 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
84
Total Points Won
84
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Adriana Reami
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Kolie Allen
53%
(
32 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Isabelle Boulais Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabelle Boulais
Player
Nana Kawagishi
64%
(
70 of
109)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
4
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
49 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
105
Total Points Won
104
|
2-6 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sakura Hosogi
Player
Isabelle Boulais
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve %
45%
(
5 of
11)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
0%
(
0 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
37%
(
10 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
8 of
11)
25
Total Points Won
13
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabelle Boulais
Player
Nagisa Imamura
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
26 of
45)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mei Yamaguchi
Player
Isabelle Boulais
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
35 of
52)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Isabelle Boulais
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabelle Boulais
Player
Xichen Zhao
63%
(
60 of
95)
1st Serve %
67%
(
76 of
113)
3
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
44 of
76)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Isabelle Boulais
Player
Niehua Tian
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
39%
(
16 of
41)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
5 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evialina Laskevich
Player
Isabelle Boulais
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
25 of
43)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jamie Loeb
Player
Isabelle Boulais
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
4
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
17 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
61
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabelle Boulais
Player
Francesca Curmi
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
20 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Loeb Vs Boulais Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
